Hyperlawhypertext legal database Heerdegen v. American Surety Co. 35 N.Y.S. 1108

← Cases

Heerdegen v. American Surety Co.

35 N.Y.S. 1108 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1895-10-29 English

Delivered by McCARTHY, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1108
HEERDEGEN, Appellant, v. AMERICAN SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October 29, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by John Heerdegen against the American Surety Company of New York.
William R. Bronk, for appellant. H. C. Willcox, for respondent.

The appellant, having stipulated (see orders), must be bound by the same. If there was no stipulation, then these orders should have been resettled, and required to recite the correct facts. We are to pass on the papers as they come to us. Order must be affirmed, with $10 costs. VAN WYCK, C. J., concurs.