Hyperlawhypertext legal database Shimm v. Exchange Broadway Bath Co. 35 N.Y.S. 1117

← Cases

Shimm v. Exchange Broadway Bath Co.

35 N.Y.S. 1117 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1895-10-29 English

Delivered by McCARTHY, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1117
SHIMM, Respondent, v. EXCHANGE BROADWAY BATH CO., Limited, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October 29, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by Luther E. Shimm against the Exchange Broadway Bath Company, Limited.
Kudlich & Finck, for appellant. Brooke & Brooke, for respondent.

The issues of fact in this case were properly submitted to the jury, and were clear and favorable to the defendant. The verdict of the jury cannot be disturbed, and, finding no errors, judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.