Majority
p. 1122BIERSCHENK et al. v. DUNPHY. (Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department. December 2, 1895.)
Headnote
Action by Charles M. Bicrschenk and another against John Dunphy.Wilson, Barker & AVilson (Frank Barker, of counsel), for appellant.
Henry Pressprich, for respondents.
This is an appeal by the owner from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The case was tried before a judge without a jury, and the findings are supported by the evidence. The record presents no error of law, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. BROAVN, J., dissents, without opinion.