Hyperlawhypertext legal database Galligan v. Groten 38 N.Y.S. 1144

← Cases

Galligan v. Groten

38 N.Y.S. 1144 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1896-04-27 English

Delivered by FITZSIMONS, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1144
GALLIGAN et al., Appellants, v. GROTEN, Respondent.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
April 27, 1896.)

Headnote

Action by James J. Galligan and others against Rodger C. Groten. T. E. Murray, for appellants. Rabe & Keller, for respondent.

There is not a single fact alleged in the affidavits upon which the attachment herein was granted that shows that the defendant was about to assign, dispose of, or secrete his property with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors (the ground upon which the same was issued). The attachment was therefore rightfully vacated, and the order appended from must be affirmed, with costs.