Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hoes v. Hume 38 N.Y.S. 1144

← Cases

Hoes v. Hume

38 N.Y.S. 1144 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1896-05-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1144
HOES, Appellant, v. HUME, Respondent.
(Supreme Court. Appellate Division, First Department.
May 1, 1896.)

Headnote

Action by William M. Hoes, as public administrator, etc., against Thomas Hume. J. W. Boothby, for appellant: R. E. Deyo, for respondent.

The rule laid down upon the previous appeal (Stebbins v. Hume, 1 N. Y. Supp. 131 ) is the law of this case, so far as this court is concerned. The trial judge ruled precisely in accordance with the views there laid down by the general term. We should therefore affirm his action. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.