Hyperlawhypertext legal database Stenson v. Koch 39 N.Y.S. 1133

← Cases

Stenson v. Koch

39 N.Y.S. 1133 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Delivered by INGRAHAM, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1133
STENSON, Respondent, v. KOCH, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
April, 1896.)

Headnote

Action by William J. Stenson, Jr., against Joseph Koch.
George Hoadly, for appellant. Daniel Clark Briggs, for respondent.

The question presented in this case is as to the constitutionality of chapter 601 of the Laws of 1895, and as we have held in the case of Koch against the mayor, decided herewith ( 39 N. Y. Supp. 164 ), that, such act is constitutional, it follows that the judgment in this case must be affirmed. There seems to be an appeal taken from the decision of the court upon which the judgment sustaining the demurrer was entered. As no appeal from such a decision lies, that appeal must be dismissed. All concur.