Hyperlawhypertext legal database Van Tassell v. Adriance 39 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Van Tassell v. Adriance

39 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1896-06-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
VAN TASSELL, Appellant, v. ADRIANCE et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 9, 1896.)

Headnote

Action by James Van Tassell against Peter Adriance and Eugene Adriance, composing the firm of Peter Adriance & Son.

No opinion. So much of order appealed from as denies the application of the plaintiff to limit the examination directed to be had to the physical injuries and condition of the plaintiff reversed, and order granted so limiting the examination of plaintiff. In other respects, order appealed from affirmed, without costs to either party. All concur.