Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re Briggs' Estate 44 N.Y.S. 1112

← Cases

In re Briggs' Estate

44 N.Y.S. 1112 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1897-03-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1112
In re BRIGGS’ ESTATE.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
March 8, 1897.)

Headnote

In the matter of the accounting of Hannah E. Andrews, as executrix, etc., of Albert N. Briggs, deceased.
Nathaniel Niles (H. A. Peckham, of counsel), for appellant.
Andrew Yanderzee (E. Countryman, of counsel), for respondent.

We think that sufficient appears in this case to authorize the surrogate to require an accounting. We "do not pass upon the appellant’s liability upon the note. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.