Hyperlawhypertext legal database Stieglitz v. Belding 44 N.Y.S. 1130

← Cases

Stieglitz v. Belding

44 N.Y.S. 1130 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1897-04-01 English

Delivered by FITZSIMONS, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1130
STIEGLITZ, Respondent, v. BELDING, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
April 1, 1897.)

Headnote

Action by Louis Stieglitz against Milo M. Belding, Jr.
Lexow, Mackellar & Wells, for appellant.
Cardoza & Nathan, for respondent.

The demurrer was properly sustained. Knorr v. Bates, 12 Misc. Rep. 396 , 33 N. Y. Supp. 691 ; Id., 14 Misc. Rep. 501 , 35 N. Y. Supp. 1060 ; Ralli v. Hillyer, 15 Misc. Rep. 692 , 40 N. Y. Supp. 1148 . The order and judgment appealed from are therefore affirmed, with costs to the respondent.

Cases cited