Hyperlawhypertext legal database Landgraff v. Nicoll 46 N.Y.S. 1095

← Cases

Landgraff v. Nicoll

46 N.Y.S. 1095 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1897-08-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1095
LANDGRAFF, Respondent, v. NICOLL et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
August 4, 1897.)

Headnote

Action by Henry A. LandgrafE against Charles H. Nicoll, impleaded, etc. W. C. Timm, for appellants. H. Thompson, for respondent.

The order must be reversed on the ground that there is no proof of any authority on the part of the attorneys for the Lloyds Company to represent the defendant Charles H. Nicoll, or to bind him by any contract of insurance. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs.