Hyperlawhypertext legal database Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. 47 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

47 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1897-10-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
DISE, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October 26, 1897.)

Headnote

Action by David Dise against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company.
Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.
Manheim & Manheim, for respondent.

There is a preponderance of

evidence in plaintiff’s favor, proving that the injuries complained of were caused by reason of defendant’s negligence, and that he was not guilty of contributory negligence. The verdict of the jury in so finding must be sustained. No error, in our opinion, was committed upon the trial. Judgment affirmed, with costs.