Hyperlawhypertext legal database Strauss v. Hoadley 48 N.Y.S. 1116

← Cases

Strauss v. Hoadley

48 N.Y.S. 1116 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 1116
STRAUSS, Respondent, v. HOADLEY, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
November, 1897.)

Headnote

Action by Adolph D. Strauss and others against Russell H. Hoadley, Joshua Piza, and others. A. G. Weil, for appellant. C. Putzel, for respondent.

For the reasons assigned

in the opinion in another action, bearing the same title, and decided herewith, the interlocutory judgment should be reversed, and judgment entered sustaining the demurrer, with leave to the plaintiffs to amend upon payment of costs in this court and court below. See 48 N. Y. Supp. 239 .