Majority
Headnote
1. Discovert—Examination of Defendant—Affidavit.This action was begun by the service of the summons, without the complaint, on the defendant Paine. The object of the action is to establish the last will and testament of one Ruby Tilden Paine, and is brought by a sister of and a beneficiary under the will , of said testatrix. An order was granted directing that the defendant Paine be examined, and that his deposition be taken, for the purpose of enabling the plaintiff to frame her complaint. Thereafter a motion was made to vacate such order, which was granted, because of defects in the plaintiff’s affidavit, and also upon the merits, in that it appeared from such papers that she was sufficiently informed of the facts to prepare a complaint; and, from the order entered thereon, this appeal is taken.
The affidavit on which the order for the examination was based complied in every respect with the formal statutory requirements; but the defects consist of certain allegations which are made upon information and belief. With respect to such defects, while it is
Without referring in further detail to the contents of the affidavit, it will be noticed, as said, that every material fact or formal statutory requirement is stated either upon positive knowledge, or upon information alleged to have been derived from the defendant; and the fact that the additional averments are made upon information and belief claimed to have been received from parties whose affidavits are not presented does not render the affidavit fatally defective, because we can treat such averments as surplusage, and, so considered, the affidavit is otherwise sufficient.
Upon the merits, we think the order for the examination should not have been vacated. It does not appear that the plaintiff has knowledge of the various provisions of the alleged will. On the other hand, the allegations are sufficiently definite to justify the inference that the defendant has such knowledge. The plaintiff states generally that she has ascertained, in addition to the fact that a will was made, that the property went to her family; but to what particular members thereof, or in what proportions, she does not know. As it is essential in a complaint of this kind that the provisions of the will claimed to have been lost should be set forth, the plaintiff is entitled to obtain the information essential to frame her complaint from those who may have knowledge of such facts.
The order should accordingly be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for examination denied, with $10 costs, but with leave to defendant to move to limit the' scope of the examination as he may be advised. All concur.