Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goodwin v. Thompson 49 N.Y.S. 1137

← Cases

Goodwin v. Thompson

49 N.Y.S. 1137 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1898-02-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1137
GOODWIN, Appellant, v. THOMPSON, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
February 18, 1898.)

Headnote

Action by Stephen W. Goodwin against Albert L. Thompson.
Jonathan C. Ross, for appellant.
Leslie M. Daniel, for respondent.

The order appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom the following clause: “Of what consists the duress referred to in said sixth paragraph of the complaint, and the time and place connected therewith, and the fear of what mischief to the property of the plaintiff and to his interests and himself he claims in said sixth paragraph of the •complaint to have influenced him.” As so modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs to either party.