Majority
Headnote
Taxation—Exemptions—Building Used for Educational Purposes.The relator is a corporation organized under the laws of this state, for the purpose of establishing and main
In preparing the assessment roll for 1897,’the assessors of Albany
“The real property of a corporation or association organized exclusively for the moral or mental improvement of men or women, or for religious, Bible, tract, charitable, benevolent, missionary, hospital, infirmary, educational, scientific, literary, library, patriotic, historical or cemetery purposes, or for the enforcement of laws relating to children or animals, or for two or more such purposes and used exclusively for carrying out thereupon one or more of such purposes; and the personal property of any such corporation shall be exempt from taxation. But no such corporation or association shall be entitled to any such exemption if any officer, member or employs thereof shall receive or may be lawfully entitled to receive any pecuniary profit from the operations thereof except reasonable compensation for services in effecting one or more of such purposes, or as proper beneficiaries of its strictly charitable purposes; or if the organization thereof for any such avowed purposes be a guise or pretense for directly or indirectly making any other pecuniary profit for such corporation or association, or for any of its members or employes, or if it be not in good faith organized or conducted exclusively for one or more of such purposes. The real property of any such corporation or association entitled to such exemption held by it exclusively for one or more of such purposes, and from which no rents, profits or income are derived, shall be so exempt, though not in actual use therefor by reason of the absence of suitable buildings or improvements thereon, if the construction of such buildings or improvements is in progress or is in good faith contemplated by such corporation or association. The real property of any such corporation not so used exclusively for carrying out thereupon one or more of such purposes, but leased or otherwise used for other purposes, shall not be exempt, but if a portion only of any lot or building of any such corporation or association is used exclusively for carrying out thereupon one or more such purposes of any such corporation or association, then such lot or building shall be so exempt only to the extent of the value of the portion so used, and the remaining or other portion to the extent of the value of such remaining or other portion shall be subject to taxation.”
There is no element of gain in the object or the operations of the relator, no capital stock, nor any provision for the making of profits or the declaration of dividends. It derives its funds from the rent of this theater, the nominal fee paid by its members, the contributions of children, and the largesses of the philanthropic. Whatever it may receive from any source it holds in trust to be devoted to the objects of its incorporation and increasing its benefits. Its affairs are conducted for a great public purpose, and the wisdom of attempting to burden such an institution with taxation is questionable. Is it permissible under the existing law?
It is contended by the learned corporation counsel who represents the assessors that, as the theater is leased for hire to persons not members of the association, the entire property is not used exclusively for the purposes for which the relator is incorporated, and that at least the portion so rented is taxable, and should be assessed; that, in order to come within the provisions of the exemption, it is necessary that the whole property should be, actually and physically, exclusively used and occupied by the association, its membersl or the public, without other charge than the nominal fee of membership; and he has fortified his* contention with an able and ingenious argu
It is evident that the legislature had in mind the existence and usefulness of organizations of this character in framing and passing the act of 1897; and it seems to me that its object was to exempt from taxation property owned by them actually used in carrying out, upon the property itself, the purposes for which the organization was formed, if of the character specified in the act, and to prevent any corporation or association, no matter how lofty or beneficent its avowed object, from using an averred aim as the pretext for the acquisition and accumulation of property, either real or personal, with the intent of shielding itself behind such an artifice to evade taxation. If the relator never permitted the use of its theater save to its own members, or to the public without charge, it is admitted that it would then be within the exemption. The fact that it lets the theater for hire to others, and that it devotes the rent received to carrying out, in other parts of the same building, the purposes for which it is incorporated, does not to my mind deprive it of the protection of the act.
While it may, perhaps, be questioned whether the intermittent character of the letting of the theater is a leasing within the purview of the statute, it cannot justly be said that it is either leased or used for purposes other than the carrying out upon the property itself of the design for which the relator is organized; for, as has before been said, the net rental is all devoted to that end, and up to this time the relator’s operations have been confined to the building of which the theater is a part. The policy of the exemption is the moral and mental improvement of men or women, the formation and maintenance of religious, benevolent, educational, patriotic, scientific, literary, historical, and burial associations, all of which are aids to and accompaniments of a refined and advanced civilization. This policy is not subverted, but, on the contrary, is promoted by permitting the
In reaching this conclusion, I am not unmindful that taxation is-the rule, and exemption the exception, and that an intent to exempt property from taxation is not to be presumed; but the true rule is that statutes such as this should be construed, not narrowly by the letter, but liberally and broadly, in view of their object and spirit; and the advantages to be derived from a generous construction will be more than an equivalent to the state and the city of Albany for the loss that may result from the relinquishment of the right of taxation over the property owned by such organizations as the relator, and devoted to kindred purposes. Nor will the state or city suffer-by such a construction, as it may safely be assumed that assessors and the courts will scrutinize each case as it arises, and see that a salutary and benignant law is not perverted to base ends. I am of the opinion that the assessment is illegal and erroneous, and should be stricken from the roll. An order to that effect may be framed, and, if counsel disagree as to its provisions, it' will be settled by me on two days’ notice.
Cases cited
- Temple Grove Seminary v. Cramer 98 N. Y. 121 at 126 p. 12
- In re the Last Will & Testament of Vassar 127 N. Y. 1 p. 12
- People ex rel. Cairns v. Murray 148 N. Y. 171 p. 12
- People ex rel. Female Academy of Sacred Heart v. Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments 64 N. Y. 656 p. 12
- Yates County National Bank v. Carpenter 119 N. Y. 550 p. 12