Majority
Headnote
Bills and'Notes—Pleading—Sham Answer—Denials—Defenses.The action is upon two promissory notes by the payee against the maker. The answer denies the allegation of the complaint that the notes were made and delivered for value. This denial raises the issue of want of consideration, it not being necessary to plead lack of consideration as a “defense.” Evans v. Williams, 60 Barb. 346 . The motion is upon affidavits to strike the answer out as sham. Code Civ. Proc. § 538. A general or special denial cannot be struck out as sham. Only “defenses” may be struck out as sham. Wayland v. Tysen, 45 N. Y. 281 . Ho issue raised by a denial is a “defense.” A “defense” is a plea of new matter, viz., matter outside of any issue which may be raised by a general or special denial. Matter which can be proved under a denial is not a “defense.” Code Civ. Proc. §§ 500, 507; Flack v. O’Brien, 19 Misc.
The motion is denied.
Cases cited
- Evans v. Williams 60 Barb. 346 p. 770
- Wayland v. Tysen 45 N. Y. 281 p. 770
- Green v. Brown 22 Misc. Rep. 279 p. 771
- Von Hagen v. Waterbury Mfg. Co. 22 Misc. Rep. 580 p. 771