Hyperlawhypertext legal database Froment v. Taylor 54 N.Y.S. 1099

← Cases

Froment v. Taylor

54 N.Y.S. 1099 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1898-11-18 English

Delivered by O’DWYER, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1099
FROMENT et al., Respondents, v. TAYLOR, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
November 18, 1898.)

Headnote

Action by Frank L. Froment and others against Nathaniel Taylor.
George W. Moon and Jesse Grant Roe, for appellant.
Richard J. Mahone, for respondents.

We are of opinion that the guaranty was a continuing one; that a cause of action thereon was sufficiently set forth in the complaint; and that the judgment was right, and should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.