Majority
p. 100(27 Misc. Rep. 11.) GOODNESS v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO. (Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County. March, 1899.)
Headnote
Motion—Furnishing Address op Party.A motion-, to require plaintiff to furnish his address will not he entertained, except on proof that his attorney refused the information desired.
Action by Theodore Goodness against the Metropolitan • Street-Railway Company. Motion to require plaintiff to furnish his place of residence, by street and number, to defendant.
Denied.
Henry A. Robinson, for the motion.
Frederick G. Wetterau, opposed.
The court should not be bothered with a motion like this except upon proof that a request has been made to the attorney for the opposite side for the information and refused. In this case the order to show cause seems to have been obtained only as a subterfuge to get an extension of time to answer.
The motion is denied with $10 costs and the extension of time to answer is vacated.