Hyperlawhypertext legal database Paling v. Perkins 57 N.Y.S. 1143

← Cases

Paling v. Perkins

57 N.Y.S. 1143 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Delivered by VAN BRUNT, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1143
PALING, Appellant, v. PERKINS et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
April, 1899.)

Headnote

Action between Mary E. Paling and James H. Perkins and another. From an order denying a motion to change the place of trial, the former appeals. Reversed. Thomas H. Lee, for appellant. T. S. Corey, for respondents.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion in the case of Thomson v. Perkins (decided herewith) 57 N. Y. Supp. 810 , the order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs to abide the event.