Hyperlawhypertext legal database Printz v. Campbell 57 N.Y.S. 1145

← Cases

Printz v. Campbell

57 N.Y.S. 1145 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1899-03-28 English

Delivered by HASGALL, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1145
PRINTZ, Appellant, v. CAMPBELL et al., Respondents.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
March 28, 1899.)

Headnote

Action by one Printz against Hotchkiss and Campbell, impleaded. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Wm. C. Reddy, for appellant. Wm. E. Stewart, for respondents.

The plaintiff clearly shaped his own course as to dealings with the respondent

p. 1146
and his co-defendant, Hotchkiss, He sold and delivered goods with eyes open as to whom he was actually dealing with, and the record but confirms this statement. We find no error committed by the court below, and think the complaint properly dismissed. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.