Majority
Headnote
Body Execution—Setting Aside.J. The defendant being held under a body execu_tion issued upon a judgment in an action for negligence, this motion is made to set it aside, upon the ground that the negligence in suit consisted of an omission, rather than a willful wrong; and the case of Lasche v. Dearing, 23 Misc. Rep. 722 , 53 N. Y. Supp. 58 , is cited as authority for the distinction. Examination of the case referred to shows that the reasoning adopted would oppose the issuance of an execution against the person in any case where the cause of action is for negligence, as distinguished from an unlawful trespass against the person; and this is contrary to controlling author-' ity. Ritterman v. Ropes, 52 N. Y. Super. Ct. 236 , and cases cited; Miller v. Woodhead, 52 Hun, 127 , 5 N. Y. Supp. 88 .
Motion denied, with $10 costs.
Cases cited
- Lasche v. Dearing 23 Misc. Rep. 722 p. 334
- Ritterman v. Ropes 52 N. Y. Super. Ct. 236 p. 334