Majority
Headnote
1. Demurrer—Form of Decision.The defendants demurred to the complaint herein upon the sole ground that it failed to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The issue of law was tried at special term, held at Amsterdam, December 24, 1898, and a decision was then signed by the presiding justice, which, after reciting certain preliminary matters, reads as follows:
“Ordered, that defendant’s demurrer be and the same is hereby overruled, with costs, and that plaintiff have judgment for the relief demanded in the complaint, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days from the service of this order on payment of costs.”
That this is a sufficient declaration to constitute a decision, as the Code contemplates, it seems to me beyond question. 2sTo stated form and no prescribed words are provided by the Code in which to express a decision. It answers the requirements if it can be seen that the court decided the question at issue, and it can also be understood how it decided. Whether the decision is expressed in good or bad English, or in good or bad form,'in prose or in rhyme, it will serve if it can be seen that the issues at law were by the court determined. The only thing which is not plain in this practice is how the courts have been able to make it difficult to the practitioner. Section 1021 of the Code says:
“The decision of the court * * * upon the trial of a demurrer * * * must direct the final or interlocutory judgment to be entered thereupon. * * * When it directs an interlocutory judgment, with leave to the party in fault to plead anew or amend, * * * it may also direct the final judgment to be entered if the party in fault fails to comply with any of the directions given or terms imposed.”
Ordered accordingly.