Hyperlawhypertext legal database Leto v. Smith 60 N.Y.S. 1142

← Cases

Leto v. Smith

60 N.Y.S. 1142 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1899-10-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1142
LETO, Respondent, v. SMITH, Appellant (two cases).
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
October 25, 1899.)

Headnote

Actions by August L. Leto and Celestine Leto, respectively, against William R. Smith. There was a judgment ior plaintiff in each action, and defendant appeals.
Reversed.
James R. Bowen, for appellant.
Charles F. Bliss, for respondents.

The record failing to show that the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the municipal court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151 , 59 N. Y. Supp. 266 , 319. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs in each case to the appellant to abide the event.