Hyperlawhypertext legal database Reitman v. Neulander 60 N.Y.S. 1146

← Cases

Reitman v. Neulander

60 N.Y.S. 1146 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1899-10-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1146
REITMAN, Respondent, v. NEULANDER, et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
October 25, 1899.)

Headnote

Action by Albert Reitman against Morris Neulander and others. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Neulander appeals.
Reversed.
Henry L. Franklin, for appellant.

The record in this case, as in that of Reitman v. Neulander (decided at this term) ubi supra, shows that the defendant Neulander, who alone appeals, is a resident of the county of Kings. The municipal court, borough of Manhattan, Fourth district, was therefore without jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, and the judgment must consequently be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151 , 59 N. Y. Supp. 266 , 319; Philip Semmer Glass Co. v. Nassau Show-Case Co., 28 Misc. Rep. 577 , 59 N. Y. Supp. 530 . Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.

Cases cited