← Cases

In re Kent

60 N.Y.S. 627 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. English

Delivered by BARNARD, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 627
In re KENT.
(Supreme Court, Special Term," Dutchess County.
October, 1897.)

Headnote

Village Board of Health—Powers—Appointment of Sanitary Inspector.
A village hoard oí health is empowered by Laws 1893, c. 661, to appoint a health officer and fix his compensation, and to perform its other duties by orders, by the imposition of penalties, and the employment of competent persons to carry its orders into effect. Its power over sewers is recommendatory, merely, to the village trustees, and its expenses have to be audited and paid as other village charges. Held, that it was unauthorized to appoint a sanitary inspector and fix his compensation.
p. 628
Application, on the relation of Edward Henry Kent, for a peremptory writ of mandamus to the board of trustees of the village of North Tarrytown.
Motion denied.
Clarence S. Davison, for the motion.
Henry C. Griffin, opposed.

The relator was employed by the local board of health of North Tarrytown. He made application for his appointment as sanitary inspector, and was appointed, and he did services for the board, the compensation for which was fixed by the board at the sum of $250. This bill was presented to the trustees of the village of North Tarrytown, and audit was refused. The board of health has no power to make the appointment or to fix the compensation of the relator. The boards of health in villages have power of appointment of a health officer, under chapter 661 of the Laws of 1893 (section 20), and to fix his compensation (section 21). The other duties of the health boards are to be done by orders, by the imposition of penalties, and by the employment of competent persons to carry the orders into effect. The power over sewers was one only of recommendation to the trustees of the village, and the expenses of these local boards of health have to be audited, levied, collected, and paid as other village charges. Sections 29, 30.

The motion should be denied, but, as the relator performed valuable services, no costs are allowed upon this motion.