Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goldsmith v. Sachs 61 N.Y.S. 1137

← Cases

Goldsmith v. Sachs

61 N.Y.S. 1137 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1899-12-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1137
GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. SACHS, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
December 28, 1899.)

Headnote

Action by Isaiah Goldth against Philip Sachs. From a judgment defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Otto Droege, for appellant. Jacob B. Engel, for ondent.

The disputed questions of —whether the note was transferred to the tiff before^ or after maturity, and whether consideration passed between the original 'es—were resolved against the plaintiff, and record presents nothing for our consideration granting interference with the judgment, ent affirmed, with costs to respondent.