Hyperlawhypertext legal database National Bank of Deposit v. Rogers 61 N.Y.S. 1143

← Cases

National Bank of Deposit v. Rogers

61 N.Y.S. 1143 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1899-11-17 English

Delivered by PATTERSON, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1143
NATIONAL BANK OF DEPOSIT OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. ROGERS et al., Defendants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
November 17, 1899.)

Headnote

Action by the National Bank of Deposit of the City of New York against Henry P. Rogers and others, executors, etc. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants move for a new trial on exceptions. Motion denied. Thaddeus D. ICenneson, for the motion. Ambrose G. Todd, opposed.

As the result of what is stated in the opinion on the appeal from the judgment in this case (decided herewith; 01 N. Y. Supp. 155 ), the motion for new trial must be denied, with costs. All concur, except MCLAUGHLIN, J., who dissents.