Hyperlawhypertext legal database Silo v. Linde 61 N.Y.S. 1148

← Cases

Silo v. Linde

61 N.Y.S. 1148 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1899-12-27 English

Delivered by O’DWYER, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1148
SILO, Respondent, v. LINDE, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
December 27, 1899.)

Headnote

Action by James P. Silo against Herman Linde. From an order denying a motion to- resettle an order, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Treadwell & Limburger, fox appellant. Oppenheim & Severance, for respondent.

On the hearing of the motion for a resettlement of the order as entered, and after having his attention directly called to the alleged errors in the- order as entered, the justice determined that the order as entered correctly stated the papers used upon the motion and the decision of the court thereon; and with that disposition by the justice presiding we are not disposed to interfere. Order appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.