Hyperlawhypertext legal database Crary v. Dimock 62 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Crary v. Dimock

62 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1900-02-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
CRARY, Respondent, v. DIMOCK et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Coui;t, Appellate Term.
February 8, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by Jessie D. Crary against Julian A. Dimock and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Bradbury C. Chetwood, for appellants. Sidney H. Stuart, for respondent.

No question of law is presented for our review, and, as the conflict of fact'was correctly disposed of below, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.