Holme v. Crimmins — 63 N.Y.S. 1110

Majority

p. 1110

HOLME, Respondent, v. CRIMMINS, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

April 5, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by one Holme against one Crimmins. From an order granting in part only a bill of particulars, and denying the motion therefor in part, defendant appeals. Modified. John T. Little, for appellant. Thomas E. Wing, for respondent.

We think the appellant entitled to the full relief sought. It seems, from the papers before us, that the items refused below were quite proper and necessary, and should follow those ordered by the special term. "So much of the order appealed from as denies further particulars is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and defendant’s demand in the notice already served is granted.

McOARTHY, j., concurs.