Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sherry v. Metropolitan St. Railway Co. 63 N.Y.S. 1116

← Cases

Sherry v. Metropolitan St. Railway Co.

63 N.Y.S. 1116 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1900-03-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1116
SHERRY v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO. O’KEEFE v. SAME.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 5, 1900.)

Headnote

Actions by James Sherry and Richard T. J. O’Keefe against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company. From judgments in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

The judgment of the justice is sustained by the weight of the evidence. The exception to the cuestión, “What, if anything, did you hear, at the time, that the tender was about crossing, or attempting to cross, the north-bound track?” was not well taken. Judgment affirmed, with costs.