Majority
p. 1132BUNDICK, Respondent, v. STRAUSS, Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. April 14, 1900.)
Headnote
Action by William II. Bundick against Julius H. Strauss.No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except BARTLETT, J., who
p. 1133
dissents on the ground that the plaintiff’s own testimony indicates that he did not regard the defendant’s treatment as a discharge.