Hyperlawhypertext legal database Falk v. Starr 64 N.Y.S. 1135

← Cases

Falk v. Starr

64 N.Y.S. 1135 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1900-04-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1135
FALK, Respondent, v. STARR, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
April 16, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by one Falk against one Starr, From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
J. Rieger, for appellant. E. Lundgreen, for respondent.

We think this case was correctly disposed of by the court below on the authority of Bernheimer v. Herrman, 44 Hun, 110 , decided in this department, and which, for that reason, we should follow rather than Sage v. Burton, 84 Hun, 267 , 32 N. Y. Supp. 1122 , elsewhere decided by a divided court. Judgment affirmed, with costs.