Hyperlawhypertext legal database Katz v. Liederman 65 N.Y.S. 1137

← Cases

Katz v. Liederman

65 N.Y.S. 1137 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1900-07-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1137
KATZ, Appellant, v. LIEDERMAN, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
July 6, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by Aaron E. Katz against David Liederman. From a judgment in favor of the defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. John E. Roeser, for appellant. L. Levene (A. B. Schleimer, of counsel), for respondent.

There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The justice had the advantage of seeing the witnesses, and an opportunity of judging as to the credit to be extended to each of them. His decision upon the conflicting testimony should not be disturbed. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.