← Cases

Lendle v. Robinson

65 N.Y.S. 1138 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1900-07-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1138
LENDLE, Respondent, v. ROBINSON et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 17, 1900.)

Headnote

Action for damages by Philip Lendle against Francis' H.’ Robinson and others. From a-judgment in, favor of the plaintiff, and an order denying: a .-¡new; trial, defendants appeal. Affirmed. ^William ‘ Blailde, for appellants. Clarence Lexow,,-for, respondent.

;The .plaintiff -brpught this ac-

tion- to recover-,.damages ,fa¿ the, loss of the services and.,society of his wife,, .owing to injuries which she sustained! through the.- .alleged negligence of the defendants. The ¡fa.ots-: involved are similar to those presented ’ in the actipn brought by Mrs. Lendle to - recover.,for the injuries which, she sustained,' and ..in, the-discussion, .of \ that, cáse ;,the', issues,, ai;q, eotisi.dered and, passed ,upop., .¡Thp ,bnly distinction oit, substance, is- in,,the different, amounts'awarded by the. jury, as ,damages. These.bieihg,,sm„alier. in -the> case,,at;‘,barí .and n,o.,sp.eoia) /stre.ss'being, made,that, if,the,plaintifll.w¿s entitled /to r,e:‘ cover, they were excessive, wé,.néec( ,nbt‘ further discuss the subject. For the' reasons, therefore, set- forth in the .opinion,in the .cg.se of' Lendle ,v.' Robinson -(Shp.).,'65,','N. Y.'Stipp.. 894, th,e . judgment ’¡herein' is. affirmed, with, costs.,1 All concur.,', , ■' 1 : ‘.'V -