Hyperlawhypertext legal database Tencorn v. Goldman 65 N.Y.S. 1147

← Cases

Tencorn v. Goldman

65 N.Y.S. 1147 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1900-06-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1147
TENCORN et al., Respondents, v. GOLDMAN et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 13, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by Isaac Tencorn and another against Aaron Goldman and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed. J. A. Seidman, for appellants. H. Levor, for respondents.

The plaintiffs having failed to make any proof of delivery of the goods, the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment which has been rendered in their favor. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.