Hyperlawhypertext legal database Townsend v. Van Buskirk 65 N.Y.S. 1148

← Cases

Townsend v. Van Buskirk

65 N.Y.S. 1148 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1900-06-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1148
TOWNSEND, Respondent, v. VAN BUS-KIRK et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 5, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by Francis H. Townsend against Mary Van Buskirk and others, impleaded with Julia" Mary Snell.

The statute overlooked by counsel can be brought to the attention of the special term upon the new trial which has been ordered. All the rights of the plaintiff may thus be preserved. The omission is not deemed a sufficient reason for granting a new argument after a lapse of 2% -years and after so great a change as has taken place in the constitution of this court. Motion for reargument demeu. See 48 N. Y. Supp. 260 .