Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hollingsworth v. Spectator Co. 66 N.Y.S. 1133

← Cases

Hollingsworth v. Spectator Co.

66 N.Y.S. 1133 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1900-07-17 Docket No. 3 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1133
HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. SPECTATOR CO., Respondent.
(No. 3.)
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 17, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by John E. Hollingsworth against the Spectator Company. From an interlocutory judgment overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to paragraphs 3 and 7 of defendant’s answer, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Henry T. Fay, for appellant. Franklin Bartlett, for respondent.

For the reasons given in :he opinion in Hollingsworth v. Spectator Company (action No. 1, handed down herewith) 65 N. Y. Supp. 812 , the interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs.