Hyperlawhypertext legal database Tanenbaum v. Lindheim 66 N.Y.S. 1146

← Cases

Tanenbaum v. Lindheim

66 N.Y.S. 1146 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1900-10-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1146
TANENBAUM v. LINDHEIM et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
October 19, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by Moses Tanenbaum against Robert Lindheim and another. From an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate an ex parte order for his examination before trial, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Jacob Fromme, for appellants. Ernest Hall, for respondent.

The questions presented in this case are the same as those in the case of Tanenbaum v. Lindheim (herewith decided) 66 N. Y. Supp. 375 , and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case the order appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for the examination of the defendant granted, with $10 costs.