Hyperlawhypertext legal database Rosenberg v. Smoke 67 N.Y.S. 1145

← Cases

Rosenberg v. Smoke

67 N.Y.S. 1145 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1900-12-26 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1145
ROSENBERG et al., Respondents, v. SMOKE, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
December 26, 1900.)

Headnote

Action by Jacob Rosenberg and another against Annie Smoke. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Maurice S. Hyman, for appellant.
Rosalsky & Rosalsky, for respondent.

The only question in this case is whether the goods, to recover the price of which this action is brought, were sold to the defendant or to her husband. Upon this there was a conflict of evidence, which the trial justice has resolved in favor of the plaintiffs. We see no reason for disturbing his decision in that regard. Judgment affirmed, with costs.