← Cases

Sloane v. McCauley

68 N.Y.S. 187 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. English

Delivered by GIEGERIGH, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 187
(33 Misc. Rep. 652.)
SLOANE v. McCAULEY.
(Supreme Court, Trial Term, New York County.
January, 1901.)

Headnote

1. Personal Injuries—Damages—Insufficiency—Verdict Set Aside.
Where the evidence showed that plaintiff received a .fracture of his kneecap; that he suffered great pain, and was permanently injured; that he was unable to work for about 120 days, during 2 months of which time he was in the hospital; and that he was earning $1.50 a day at the time of the accident,—a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for 6 cents damages will be set aside as insufficient.
'2. Same—New Trial—Costs of Former Trial.
Where a motion for a new trial is based on error of the jury in bringing in a verdict for insufficient damages, the party making the motion must pay the costs of the former trial as a condition precedent to the granting of a new trial.
Action by John Sloane against John McCauley. Motion by plaintiff to set aside a verdict in his favor for insufficiency, and for a new trial.
Granted.
Jerolomon & Arrowsmith (John Jerolomon, of counsel), for the motion.
Frederic J. Swift, opposed.

The jury by their verdict having determined the plaintiff’s right to a recovery, it was their duty to award such damages as would compensate him for the injuries he received. Brown v. Foster, 1 App. Div. 578 , 37 N. Y. Supp. 502 ; Aiello v. Aaron (Sup.) 68 N. Y. Supp. 186 , per Gildersleeve, J. It appears from the plaintiff’s evidence, without contradiction by the defendant, that the former received a fracture of the right kneecap; that he suffered great pain; that the injury is a permanent one; that in consequence of the injury he was unable to work for a period of about 120 days, 2 months of such time having been spent in a hospital; and that when the accident occurred he was earning $1.50 per day. It is obvious that in assessing the plaintiff’s damages at 6 cents the jury did not take into consideration the items of damage whereby the plaintiff’s right to a compensatory award is to be measured in an action of this character. “These are,” said the court in Brown v. Foster, at page 579, 1 App.

p. 188
Div., and page 502, 37 N. Y. Supp., “the bodily injuries sustained; the pain suffered; the effect on the health of the sufferer, according to its degree and its probable duration; the expenses incidental to attempts to effect a cure or to lessen the injury; the pecuniary loss sustained through inability to attend to a business, as to which, again, the injury may be temporary or permanent.” The damages being unquestionably insufficient, the verdict must be set aside, and a new trial ordered. It is a rule that, where the motion for a new trial is based upon an error of the jury, it will be granted only on payment by the party making it of costs of the former trial as a condition to the granting of the favor. Brown v. Foster, supra; O’Shea v. McLear (Sup.) N. Y. Supp. 407. The court in O’Shea v. McLear, supra, commenting upon the practice, said: “This rule seems to be too firmly established to be departed from, even in a case of seeming hardship.” 31otion granted upon payment by the plaintiff within 30 days after notice of entry of the order of the costs of the former trial.

Cases cited