Hyperlawhypertext legal database Railway Advertising Co. v. Baggot 69 N.Y.S. 1144

← Cases

Railway Advertising Co. v. Baggot

69 N.Y.S. 1144 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1901-04-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1144
RAILWAY ADVERTISING CO., Respondent, v. BAGGOT, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
April 22, 1901.)

Headnote

Action by the Railway Advertising Company against At-more L. Baggot. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Milton Mayer, for appellant.
Einstein & Townsend, for respondent.

The sole question here is as to the extent of an agent’s authority. The evidence was conflicting. It was submitted to the jury in a fair and careful charge, and we see no reason to interfere with their verdict Judgment affirmed, with costs.