Hyperlawhypertext legal database Read v. Hobart 69 N.Y.S. 1144

← Cases

Read v. Hobart

69 N.Y.S. 1144 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1901-03-12 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1144
READ v. HOBART et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
March 12, 1901.)

Headnote

Action by Laura Read against George Bf. Hobart and others.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that nothing is presented for our review by the appellant’s exceptions; also, held, that the motion, made by the appellants upon the argument of the appeal, for leave to file exception to referee’s report nunc pro tunc, be denied. All concúr, except SPRING, J., who concurs for affirmance on the merits.