Majority
Headnote
Amendment after Judgment.The plaintiff, in June, 1900, sued the defendant: in the municipal court of the city of Hew York for goods sold and. delivered, seeking thereby to recover the last installments due upon, a watch sold under a conditional contract of sale. The defendant-defaulted, and the case was tried on September 21, 1900, the justice rendering a simple money judgment. On May 29, 1901, the-justice and the attorneys for the plaintiff signed a stipulation that' the return should be amended so as to read that plaintiff complainedi of defendant in “conversion,” and that the words “goods sold and; delivered” in said return be stricken out. This was long subsequent: to the appeal, which was taken on October 1, 1900. The appeal by the plaintiff is taken in order to procure an amendment of the judgment so that it shall state that the defendant is subject to arrest and imprisonment. The appeal cannot prevail. The plaintiff might, doubtless have originally sued in conversion, but he elected to suey as he had a right to do, for goods sold and delivered, and the judgement rendered followed precisely the complaint. It is too late after-a cause has gone to judgment, without notice to the defendant, by a consent signed merely by the plaintiff’s attorney and the justice^, to amend the complaint, and upon such an amendment base an appeal for the amendment of the judgment.
The judgment must be affirmed-, with costs.