Hyperlawhypertext legal database Brierly v. Connelly 72 N.Y.S. 1095

← Cases

Brierly v. Connelly

72 N.Y.S. 1095 Court N.Y. App. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 1095
BRIERLY, Respondent, v. CONNELLY, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June, 1901.)

Headnote

Action by John J. Brierly against Martin Connelly.
John P. Flanigan, for appellant. Thomas Garret Fennell, for respondent.

There were questions of fact upon which the evidence was conflicting. The case was submitted to the jury under an unexceptionable charge. There aré no exceptions in the case calling for comment. Judgment should be affirmed, with costs, without opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.