Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hughes v. Martin 72 N.Y.S. 1108

← Cases

Hughes v. Martin

72 N.Y.S. 1108 Court N.Y. App. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 1108
HUGHES, Respondent, v. MARTIN, Appellant.
(Supreme Court. Appellate Term.
June, 1901.)

Headnote

Action by Albert Hughes against Charles Martin.
S. G. Derrickson, for appellant. Jeroloman & Arrowsmith, for respondent.

The indisputable evidence showed that defendant, under an assumed name, employed the plaintiff as a broker in realty to perform services for him. Those services were rendered, and the defendant failed to pay the regular commission. We think the judgment ■awarded for such commission is correct. Judgment affirmed, with costs.