Kirkman v. Carlstadt Chemical Co.

72 N.Y.S. 1113 Court N.Y. App. Term English

Contents

Majority

p. 1113

KIRKMAN, Appellant, v. CARLSTADT CHEMICAL CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

June, 1901.)

Action

p. 1114

by Samuel J. ICirkman against the Carlstadt Chemical Company.

E. S. Hull, Jr., for appellant. Holt & Duross, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.