Hyperlawhypertext legal database Kreizer v. Kitaoka 72 N.Y.S. 1114

← Cases

Kreizer v. Kitaoka

72 N.Y.S. 1114 Court General Term. English

Contents

Majority

p. 1114
KREIZER, Respondent, v. KITAOKA, Appellant.
(City Court of New York,
General Term.
May, 1901.)

Headnote

Action by Bernard Kreizer against Yoshizo ICitaoka.
Stern, Singer & Barr (William J. Barr, of counsel), for appellant. Fromrne Bros. (James A. Dtiuglas, of counsel), for respondent.

The order appealed from must be affirmed. The record shows willful contempt for the court's mandate. The defendant disposed of his property contrary to the injunction contained in the order for his examination, thereby causing plaintiff’s damage in at least the sum of $250. The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs.