Hyperlawhypertext legal database Respondent v. Manhattan Railway Co. 73 N.Y.S. 1132

← Cases

Respondent v. Manhattan Railway Co.

73 N.Y.S. 1132 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1901-12-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1132
CONNELL. Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Eirst Department.
December 6, 1901.)

Headnote

Action by Eugene T. Connell against the Manhattan Railway Company and others. J. H. Adams, for appellants. H. G. Atwater, for respondent.

Judgment modified, by reducing the amount awarded for fee damage to $1,200, and by reducing the judgment for rental damage, as entered, to the sum of $1,466, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.