Hyperlawhypertext legal database R. Hudnut's Pharmacy v. Tankard 73 N.Y.S. 1145

← Cases

R. Hudnut's Pharmacy v. Tankard

73 N.Y.S. 1145 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1901-12-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1145
R. HUDNUT’S PHARMACY, Appellant, v. TANKARD, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 6, 1901.)

Headnote

Suit by R. Hudnut’s Pharmacy against Joseph Tankard. From an older denying a motion for an injunction, complainant
p. 1146
appeals. Affirmed. E. S. White, for appellant. S. Riker, Jr., for respondent.

We do not think that the facts presented upon this application would justify us in reversing the order below. The question as to whether or not an injunction should be granted, and as to the extent of the injunction, should be left to be determined upon the trial. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.